The Ventura County City Files · Part 3 of 3

Investor Education · 10 min read

Ojai: Where the Rules Are the Investment Case

We do not manage in Ojai. The drive is too long to deliver the response times we hold ourselves to, and that was true before we sat down to write this.

Having now gone through the ordinances line by line, the distance is no longer the main reason.

Ojai is not a harder version of Oxnard. It is a different kind of regulation entirely. Oxnard and Ventura regulate the relationship between landlord and tenant — what you can charge, when you can terminate, how you must behave. Ojai does that too, but its most consequential rules regulate the use of the land itself. That distinction sounds academic until you understand what it does to your options.

Here is Ojai in the same eight fields.

1. Rent regulation

Ojai's Rent Stabilization and Just Cause Tenant Protection Ordinance — Ordinance No. 937, codified at Title 11 of the Ojai City Code — took effect April 28, 2023. The council adopted it on a 3-2 vote.

Chapter 1 caps annual rent increases at 4%, with no more than one increase in any 12-month period, for non-exempt properties. Landlords may petition the Community Development Director for an increase above the cap where necessary for a fair return, a process involving tenant notification, a 30-day response period, and departmental review.

Coverage generally reaches multifamily properties issued their first certificate of occupancy before February 1, 1995. The Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act exempts single-family homes and condominiums from the cap, exactly as it does in Oxnard.

So the headline is familiar: if you own a house or condominium in Ojai, the 4% cap is not your problem. Chapter 2 might be.

2. Just cause and termination

Chapter 2 limits the grounds for eviction for most tenancies in the city, and protections attach after a tenant has been in place at least 30 days — the same aggressive timeline Oxnard uses, and a fraction of AB 1482's twelve months.

No-fault evictions require relocation assistance of two months' current rent or $5,000, whichever is greater.

The ordinance is expressly more protective than AB 1482, and it provides that where local and state requirements conflict, the more restrictive applies to the maximum extent of the city's power.

The coverage question every Ojai owner should ask. Reporting at the time of adoption indicates the tenant protection chapter reaches multiunit buildings and single-family homes not owned by an individual. What counts as ownership by an individual is not a question this post can answer, and it is not one you should answer from a form.

If you hold an Ojai rental in a trust, the analysis depends on the trust instrument — whether it is revocable or irrevocable, who the beneficiaries are, and how the ordinance reads against that structure. Two owners with identical properties and differently drafted trusts can land on opposite sides of a 30-day just cause obligation.

Ask your attorney this specific question: given how I hold title, does Chapter 2 apply to my property? It is the highest-value question an Ojai owner can ask right now, and the answer is worth more than anything else in this post.

There is also a substantial remodel provision at Municipal Code § 11-2.05, defining qualifying work as replacement or substantial modification of a structural, electrical, plumbing, or mechanical system requiring a permit, or abatement of hazardous materials including lead-based paint, mold, or asbestos, where the work cannot reasonably be accomplished safely with the tenant in place and requires the tenant to vacate for at least 30 days.

Read that standard carefully before planning any renovation that depends on vacancy. It is narrower than owners assume.

3. Registration

Chapter 1 requires landlords to register rental property with the city and establishes an administrative hearing process.

Confirm current registration requirements, fees, and deadlines directly with Ojai's Community Development Department. Registration obligations are the easiest compliance item to miss and among the more consequential to have missed.

4. Enforcement posture

Ojai's enforcement is not organized around habitability inspection. It is organized around the short-term rental prohibition, and it is genuinely proactive.

City staff identify violations by reviewing listing websites and reading guest reviews of properties in the city. That is not complaint-driven enforcement waiting for a neighbor to call. That is active surveillance of the platforms, and it works.

5. Short-term rentals

This is the field that decides everything else in Ojai, and it deserves precision.

Short-term rentals are prohibited throughout the City of Ojai. Not restricted, not capped, not permitted-with-conditions. Prohibited.

The legal architecture matters. Ojai did not write an ordinance banning short-term rentals in residential zones. Ojai's code requires that a proposed land use be expressly identified as allowed in the applicable zone, and short-term rental simply does not appear in the tables of permitted uses — not in residential zones, and not in village mixed-use. The prohibition exists because the use was never authorized.

That is a far more durable structure than a ban. There is no permit cap to expand, no waiting list to join, no grandfathering to claim. There is nothing to be admitted to.

The city confirmed the existing prohibition by Resolution 16-07 in 2016, added an advertising ban through Ordinance 862, and strengthened enforcement again through Ordinance 943 in April 2024 on a unanimous vote.

What short-term means. Rental of a space for 30 days or less, including an entire home or any portion of a home. Fractional vacation property arrangements — ownership interests structured to permit occupancy or rental for under 30 days — are expressly included as unlawful. Hotels, motels, and permitted bed and breakfast establishments are the exceptions. Rentals longer than 30 days are fine.

What it costs. Fines at the state-allowable maximums: $1,500 for a first violation, $3,000 for a second within one year of the first, and $5,000 for each additional violation within one year of the first. Advertising an unlawful short-term rental is itself a violation. And as of the 2024 amendments, the city may disgorge revenue the owner collected from illegal short-term renting.

Who is liable. The penalty provision reaches any person, including property owners, tenants, brokers, or property managers, whether as principal, agent, employee, or otherwise.

Read that as an operator. If you manage an Ojai property and your tenant lists it for weekend rentals, you are named in the penalty structure. Not the owner alone — you. Any manager taking on Ojai inventory needs lease language prohibiting sublease and short-term listing, an active monitoring practice, and a documented response protocol. That is a real operating cost, and it is part of why the economics of managing in Ojai are worse than the door count suggests.

And the workaround does not work. The county maintains an overlay zone covering the Ojai Valley outside city limits, from Foster Park to the East End, prohibiting Temporary Rental Units — the short-term or vacation rental of residences, separate cottages, and accessory dwelling units. Where county permits are available, only a property owner may hold one, it expires upon change of ownership, and an owner may hold only one at a time. Designated historic landmark properties receive an exception.

Buying just outside the city line to run a vacation rental in the Ojai Valley is not a strategy. It is a fine.

6. Housing stock and operating economics

Ojai's stock skews old, small, and architecturally particular. Historic designation is common enough to be a live consideration rather than a curiosity, and it constrains exterior work in ways that raise costs and extend timelines.

The valley's fire exposure is severe and it is the dominant insurance variable. The Thomas Fire burned through the valley in December 2017. Availability and pricing for wildland-urban interface coverage in Ojai is a first-order question in any hold-versus-sell analysis, not a line item.

Vendor depth is thin. There are fewer contractors, and the ones who work in the valley price accordingly. Response times run longer for anyone dispatching from the coast — which, as we said at the top, is precisely why we do not take work there.

7. Demand engine

Ojai's economy is built on tourism, wellness, arts, and hospitality, with agriculture in the surrounding valley.

That composition is not incidental to the regulatory picture. It is the cause of it. A small city with a large visitor economy and a tightly constrained housing supply faces continuous pressure to convert long-term housing to visitor accommodation. The short-term rental prohibition, the advertising ban, the revenue disgorgement, the county overlay — all of it is a response to that pressure.

Understand this and the ordinances stop looking arbitrary. Ojai has concluded that its housing stock cannot serve both its residents and its visitors, and has chosen residents, comprehensively and repeatedly, across multiple councils.

The operating consequence: long-term rental demand is real, but the qualified pool is small and it is competing against second-home buyers for the same inventory. Hospitality and service employment does not generate the income profile that supports the rent levels Ojai property values imply. That gap is the central operating problem in this market.

8. Rent, hold, or sell in Ojai

Toward holding. Genuine scarcity, strong underlying property values, and a city actively protecting long-term housing supply from conversion — which supports long-term rental demand by design.

Toward selling. The regulatory ceiling on what the asset can ever become. Ojai property values are supported substantially by second-home and lifestyle demand, while rental income is capped by a service-economy tenant base. The short-term rental option that would close that gap is permanently unavailable. Add fire insurance exposure, thin vendor depth, and the possibility of 30-day just cause depending on how you hold title.

The question that actually decides it. In most cities the rent-hold-sell analysis turns on the numbers. In Ojai it turns on whether you accept that the property will only ever be a long-term rental, at a yield that will not reflect what the asset is worth. If you are holding an Ojai property for appreciation and lifestyle use, that is coherent. If you are holding it for yield, the ordinances have already answered you.

That is not a criticism of Ojai's choices. A city is entitled to decide what it wants to be, and Ojai has decided with unusual clarity. But an investor should read that decision as the binding constraint it is, rather than as a temporary condition that might loosen.

What changed, what's pending

  • 2016 — Resolution 16-07 confirmed the existing short-term rental prohibition. Ordinance 862 banned advertising for unlawful short-term rentals.
  • April 28, 2023 — Ordinance No. 937 took effect: 4% rent cap and just cause protections attaching at 30 days.
  • April 2024 — Ordinance 943 strengthened enforcement unanimously, adding revenue disgorgement and raising fines to state maximums.

This post describes local ordinances as we understand them at the time of writing and is not legal advice. County Property Management does not manage property in Ojai. Confirm current requirements with the City of Ojai and review your specific situation with a qualified California attorney.

Continue the Series

Want the full investor letter series?

Seven short letters on conflict-free property management, tenant screening, vacancy economics, and the questions every investor should ask their property manager. One letter every few days. Unsubscribe anytime.

Get Investor Insights

Receive practical guidance for owning and managing rental property in Ventura County.

By submitting this form, you agree to be contacted by County Property Management about investor insights, property management, and related rental ownership topics.